|
IDHAE INFORMATION
|
|
The
State Security Court on has acquitted the leading human rights activist of
accusations of anti-government activity, dropping all charges against him. The
State Security Court on Sunday said Aktham Naisse, chairman of the Committees
for the Defence of Democratic Liberties and Human Rights in Syria, was
exonerated of all charges. Syria's
official news agency, SANA, said Naisse was acquitted because his case lacked
"legal evidence", adding that some of the charges were dropped
under a 2004 presidential amnesty. Naisse
was arrested in April 2004 on charges of spreading false information, forming
an underground group, having links to international human rights
organisations and other charges related to opposing the ruling Baath party. He
was released from prison four months later on $200 bail. Court slammed
Naisse
could not be reached for comment, but his lawyer, Anwar al-Bunni, said the
State Security Court "was unconstitutional, illegal and unjust",
despite Sunday's acquittal. "(Four)
months in prison, who can compensate for that?" he asked. SANA
said Sunday's hearing was attended by Naisse's lawyers and representatives of
foreign diplomatic missions in Damascus. Decisions
by the State Security Court, which was created under Syria's 1963 emergency
laws and where cases are often heard by military judges, cannot be appealed. Verdict hailed
Ammar
Qurabi, spokesman for the Arab Human Rights Organisation, called the verdict
"excellent" and expressed hope that other political prisoners would
be released soon. The charges against Aktham Naisse are believed to stem from his human rights
activities. In March 2004 he organised a rare protest outside Syria's
parliament, which security agents quickly broke up. He and other activists were
detained for a few hours and released. Separately,
the court on Sunday sentenced three Kurds to prison terms ranging from 30 to
36 months for "belonging to a banned political party". The
nineth " Ludovic-Trarieux " was awarded on April 23rd
2004 to Aktham Naisse and was
presented to the prize winner, in Brussels on October 8th 2004. The IDHAE welcomes the decision of the
Syrian Supreme State Security Court (SSSC)
to drop charges against Syrian human rights defender Aktham Naisse.
Aktham Naisse, a lawyer and the president
of the Committees for the Defence of Democratic Freedoms and Human Rights in
Syria (CDF), was arrested Tuesday
April 13, 2004 in Latakia, and has been detained by the military security
services since then. According to EMHRN sources, Mr.
Naisse was detained in an individual cell in the criminal department of the Saidnaya prison,
well-known for the very harsh conditions of detention imposed on political
prisoners, where he is isolated in an individual cell, in the section for
ordinary criminals. The CDF has lately been very active in defending
human rights in Syria. From among their activities can be mentioned: a
manifestation in front of the Syrian Parliament to put an end to the state of
emergency in Syria (8 March), an on-line petition (signed by more than 7000
persons) calling for reforms and an end of the exceptional laws, the
publication of the CDF annual report for 2003, a condemnation against the
Syrian security forces’ use of torture which has lead to the death of Kurdish
Syrian citizens (11 April). Aktham Naisse is accused of undermining the objectives of the
Revolution. He will be trialed in the State Security
Court, under Syrian emergency laws. He is accused of “undermining the
objectives of the Revolution: Arab unity, liberty and socialism”, as well as
spreading false information about Syria. He risks up to 15 years
imprisonment. Mr. Naisse and CDF have been very active in
defending Human Rights in Syria and have recently been increasinly harassed
by the Syrian authorities. Latest on 11 February he was detained and
interogated by the military secret service. During the interogation Mr.
Naisse was harassed and threatened not to be allowed to travel outside Syria. On 26 July, human rights defender and prisoner of conscience from 1991
to 1998, Aktham Naisse, was tried before the SSSC on charges relating to his
work in defence of human rights. He previously appeared before the SSSC on 22
April. Mr. Naisse was not allowed to meet privately with his lawyers. The Supreme State Security Court
does not respect all the guarantees of a fair trial. Particularly worrying in
this regard, is that usual criminal procedures relative to a fair trial are
not applicable before this Court (according to decree 47 passed in 1968). In
addition, the SSSC does not fall under the authority of the higher judiciary
but under the National Security Office of the Baath Party. Moreover, one
military judge is among the panel of three judges. The decisions of the SSSC
cannot be appealed. |
|||